In
the Readings for this Sunday, we are following 1 Corinthians and the Gospel of
Mark ad seriatim, so there is less
cohesion between the Second Reading and the Gospel than on a high feast day.
Nonetheless,
the Readings this week can be linked by the theme of “hearing the voice of the
prophet.”
1. The First Reading is a very famous passage
from the Book of Deuteronomy that should be familiar to every Catholic student
of biblical theology:
Reading 1 Dt 18:15-20
Moses spoke to all the people, saying:
"A prophet like me will the LORD, your God, raise up for you
from among your own kin;
to him you shall listen.
This is exactly what you requested of the LORD, your God, at Horeb
on the day of the assembly, when you said,
'Let us not again hear the voice of the LORD, our God,
nor see this great fire any more, lest we die.'
And the LORD said to me, 'This was well said.
I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their kin,
and will put my words into his mouth;
he shall tell them all that I command him.
Whoever will not listen to my words which he speaks in my name,
I myself will make him answer for it.
But if a prophet presumes to speak in my name
an oracle that I have not commanded him to speak,
or speaks in the name of other gods, he shall die.'"
"A prophet like me will the LORD, your God, raise up for you
from among your own kin;
to him you shall listen.
This is exactly what you requested of the LORD, your God, at Horeb
on the day of the assembly, when you said,
'Let us not again hear the voice of the LORD, our God,
nor see this great fire any more, lest we die.'
And the LORD said to me, 'This was well said.
I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their kin,
and will put my words into his mouth;
he shall tell them all that I command him.
Whoever will not listen to my words which he speaks in my name,
I myself will make him answer for it.
But if a prophet presumes to speak in my name
an oracle that I have not commanded him to speak,
or speaks in the name of other gods, he shall die.'"
The
context is, at the end of his life, Moses is giving his valedictory speech to
the people of Israel (which is basically the whole Book of Deuteronomy), and
amongst his various warnings and promises, he prophesies that God will one day
send the people of Israel a prophet like himself, to whom they will need to
listen in order to be saved.
Now,
the term “like” can have at least two senses: similar to, or equal to. What we find out is that all the great
prophets of Israel: Samuel, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, etc.
were like Moses in the sense of “similar to.” However, none were his equal, as Moses’
epitaph in Deuteronomy states:
Deut. 34:10 And there has not arisen a prophet since
in Israel like Moses, whom the LORD knew face to face, 11 none like him
for all the signs and the wonders which the LORD sent him to do in the land of
Egypt, to Pharaoh and to all his servants and to all his land, 12 and for
all the mighty power and all the great and terrible deeds which Moses wrought
in the sight of all Israel.
Therefore,
on the basis of this prophecy of Deuteronomy 18, the “Prophet like Moses”
became one of the standard anticipated eschatological figures in Judaism, along
with the prophet Elijah (based on Malachi 4:5) and the Son of David (based on
Ezek 37:24-25 and many other texts).
This is necessary background information for understanding what the
priests and Levites mean when they ask John the Baptist, “Are you the Prophet?”
in John 1:21. Also, the Samaritans,
since they did not accept as canonical anything but the Five Books of Moses,
had no other Messianic expectation than for the “Prophet like Moses.” So when the Samaritan woman at the well says,
“I know that the Messiah is coming” (John 4:25), her understanding of the
Messiah would have been shaped almost solely in Mosaic terms.
The
one catch was, when the “Prophet like Moses” did come, everyone had to listen
to him, or else face the judgment of God.
But
the Apostle John asserts that Jesus is not only equal to Moses, but
superior to him:
John 1:17 For the law was given through Moses; grace
and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has ever seen God; the
only Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known.
2. The Psalm
ties closely to the First Reading. It
urges us to listen to the voice of God—something that the Israelite tribes
didn’t want to do. Not only did they not
want to hear God’s voice directly (see the First Reading) but time and again
they rebelled against God’s Word give to them through Moses (there are ten
rebellions recorded in the Book of Numbers).
With the coming of Jesus, we have a new chance, a new start, a New
Covenant. Let’s listen to the new
Prophet like Moses and obey his words while we have the opportunity:
Responsorial Psalm Ps 95:1-2, 6-7, 7-9
R.
(8) If today you hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
Come, let us sing joyfully to the LORD;
let us acclaim the rock of our salvation.
Let us come into his presence with thanksgiving;
let us joyfully sing psalms to him.
R. If today you hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
Come, let us bow down in worship;
let us kneel before the LORD who made us.
For he is our God,
and we are the people he shepherds, the flock he guides.
R. If today you hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
Oh, that today you would hear his voice:
"Harden not your hearts as at Meribah,
as in the day of Massah in the desert,
Where your fathers tempted me;
they tested me though they had seen my works."
R. If today you hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
Come, let us sing joyfully to the LORD;
let us acclaim the rock of our salvation.
Let us come into his presence with thanksgiving;
let us joyfully sing psalms to him.
R. If today you hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
Come, let us bow down in worship;
let us kneel before the LORD who made us.
For he is our God,
and we are the people he shepherds, the flock he guides.
R. If today you hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
Oh, that today you would hear his voice:
"Harden not your hearts as at Meribah,
as in the day of Massah in the desert,
Where your fathers tempted me;
they tested me though they had seen my works."
R. If today you hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
3. In the Second
Reading, St. Paul teaches on marriage and celibacy:
Reading 2 1 Cor 7:32-35
Brothers and sisters:
I should like you to be free of anxieties.
An unmarried man is anxious about the things of the Lord,
how he may please the Lord.
But a married man is anxious about the things of the world,
how he may please his wife, and he is divided.
An unmarried woman or a virgin is anxious about the things of the Lord,
so that she may be holy in both body and spirit.
A married woman, on the other hand,
is anxious about the things of the world,
how she may please her husband.
I am telling you this for your own benefit,
not to impose a restraint upon you,
but for the sake of propriety
and adherence to the Lord without distraction.
I should like you to be free of anxieties.
An unmarried man is anxious about the things of the Lord,
how he may please the Lord.
But a married man is anxious about the things of the world,
how he may please his wife, and he is divided.
An unmarried woman or a virgin is anxious about the things of the Lord,
so that she may be holy in both body and spirit.
A married woman, on the other hand,
is anxious about the things of the world,
how she may please her husband.
I am telling you this for your own benefit,
not to impose a restraint upon you,
but for the sake of propriety
and adherence to the Lord without distraction.
I once lived in a Christian community that had many positive
features, but unfortunately almost no theology of singleness or celibacy, no
use for the religious life, and in fact a contempt for the practice of
religious celibacy in the Catholic tradition.
One of the results of this attitude was a strong pressure in my former
community for everyone to marry, and a feeling of pity for anyone who made it
out of the college years without finding a spouse: a kind of sense that the
single person could not be happy or was incomplete.
In hindsight, I’m surprised that I and my community did not
reflect more on Paul’s teaching given to us in the Second Reading, especially
since we were so focused on Scripture and especially the writings of Paul. In this passage, Paul points out that
singleness is to be encouraged, because it means freedom: a freedom to be fully
focused on the Lord. The celibate life
should not be construed in terms of restriction (what he can’t do) but in terms of freedom (what he can do because he is available for the Lord). The single Christian is not “incomplete” and
doesn’t deserve “pity,” but ought to use his or her freedom from encumbrance to
focus more deeply on a life of prayer and service. Such a person is able to hear and respond
more quickly and fully to the voice of God, as the previous Psalm urged us.
In the Catholic tradition, the custom became, from early
times, to choose priests from those Christian men who had committed themselves
to a celibate life. Let me repeat that: to
choose priests from among men who had committed themselves to celibacy. (In the early centuries, many Christian men
gave themselves to a celibate vocation, not simply those in the religious life
or priesthood.) That is the proper way
to frame priestly celibacy in the Latin Rite: not a restriction imposed on men
who want to be priests, but a decision to choose priests from among those who
have so committed themselves. Some
apostolates within the Church, like the Prelature of Opus Dei, continue to
foster celibate vocations for lay people, and then periodically request some of
these men to seek ordination. We need to
return to this attitude for the entire Church: every Catholic young person
should consider whether they may be called to follow Christ in a life of
singleness—which allows them to be available to serve the needs of the Church
and society—even in the world, even apart from taking religious vows per se.
4. The Gospel continues our journey through Mark:
Gospel Mk 1:21-28
Then they came to Capernaum,
and on the Sabbath Jesus entered the synagogue and taught.
The people were astonished at his teaching,
for he taught them as one having authority and not as the scribes.
In their synagogue was a man with an unclean spirit;
he cried out, "What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth?
Have you come to destroy us?
I know who you are? the Holy One of God!"
Jesus rebuked him and said,
"Quiet! Come out of him!"
The unclean spirit convulsed him and with a loud cry came out of him.
All were amazed and asked one another,
"What is this?
A new teaching with authority.
He commands even the unclean spirits and they obey him."
His fame spread everywhere throughout the whole region of Galilee.
and on the Sabbath Jesus entered the synagogue and taught.
The people were astonished at his teaching,
for he taught them as one having authority and not as the scribes.
In their synagogue was a man with an unclean spirit;
he cried out, "What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth?
Have you come to destroy us?
I know who you are? the Holy One of God!"
Jesus rebuked him and said,
"Quiet! Come out of him!"
The unclean spirit convulsed him and with a loud cry came out of him.
All were amazed and asked one another,
"What is this?
A new teaching with authority.
He commands even the unclean spirits and they obey him."
His fame spread everywhere throughout the whole region of Galilee.
We find that Jesus—viral You Tube videos
notwithstanding—does not disdain the practices of “religion,” but participates
in the study, prayer, and worship of the local synagogue along with his fellow
Jews. His manner of teaching shocks
people: he teaches “with authority” unlike the scribes. The scribes were religious scholars (like
myself and the other contributors to this blog) who were taught to debate based
on detailed arguments and careful citation of authoritative texts and older, revered
teachers. Jesus, on the other hand,
taught on the basis of his personal authority, as Prophet and as God.
That Jesus actually did have this authority is
demonstrated dramatically when the “unclean spirit” heeds his voice and departs
from the possessed man.
First, it is interested that the possessed man was
present in the synagogue. It shows us
that those under the influence of spirits of evil may be found even in places
of worship. (This fact will not surprise people who have done a lot of parish
ministry.) Even today, the Church is not free from the activity of persons who
are diametrically opposed to her mission, and need to be liberated from the
bondage to evil that afflicts them. Pope Francis speaks of a kind of bondage to
evil which he characterizes as “corruption,” which is a blindness toward one’s
own sin, a frozen conscience which does not convict oneself of one’s own
wrongdoing, a refusal to dialogue with those with whom one disagrees, an unwillingness to accept correction, and a hostility toward those
that would point out one’s faults. This
kind of “corruption,” the Pope says, is found also in the Church, and we might
add: it may well be a manifestation of the demonic.
Second, we note that the power over the spirits of
evil is still exercised by the Church, most dramatically in formal exorcism,
but also in the other sacraments, particularly Confession. I have spoken on this on many occasions, but
the sacrament of confession has great power for spiritual warfare, and those in
spiritual bondage should make frequent recourse to it. Permit me to share some quotes from the
famous Fr. Gabrielle Amorth, the chief exorcist of Rome under the pontificates
of St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI:
“Many times I have written that Satan is much more
enraged when we take souls away from him
through confession than when we take away bodies through exorcism.” (Fr.
Gabrielle Amorth, An Exorcist Tells His Story, Ignatius Press,
1990, p. 67)
“Q. My pastor claims the best exorcism is confession.
A. He is right. It is the most direct
means to fight Satan, because it is the sacrament that tears souls from the
demon’s grasp, strengthens against sin, unites us more closely to God, and
helps conform our souls increasingly to the divine will. I advise frequent confession, possibly
weekly, to all victims of evil activities.” (Amorth, Exorcist:
More Stories, 195)
“In my experience, a good general
confession—which I always recommend as a starting point—in conjunction with
an intense life of prayer and grace, is sufficient to end the afflictions. Without prayer and grace, exorcisms are
ineffective.” (Amorth, Exorcist: More Stories, 79)
The Church’s power over the spirits of evil derives
from her bond with her Lord: she is the body of Christ, and she speaks with
Christ’s authority. And Christ is the
new Prophet like Moses, the definitive spokesman of God, to whom all must
listen or else stand before God to give account.
No comments:
Post a Comment