Lent
is drawing to a close. This week we
celebrate the last Sunday of Lent before the beginning of Passion Week. This Sunday is period of “quiet” between
Laetare Sunday and Passion/Palm Sunday, our last opportunity to meditate on the
‘ordinary’ struggle of Lent before the intensity of the events in the last week
of Our Lord’s life. Let’s use it well!
The
Readings for this week focus on the theme of a “New Exodus.” Just as Moses was a savior figure who lead
Israel to freedom through the Red Sea, so Jesus leads us to freedom through the
waters of Baptism. Let’s see how this
theme plays out:
1. Our First Reading is Isaiah 43:16-21:
Thus says the LORD,
who opens a way in the sea
and a path in the mighty
waters,
who leads out chariots and
horsemen,
a powerful army,
till they lie prostrate
together, never to rise,
snuffed out and quenched
like a wick.
Remember not the events of
the past,
the things of long ago
consider not;
see, I am doing something
new!
Now it springs forth, do
you not perceive it?
In the desert I make a
way,
in the wasteland, rivers.
Wild beasts honor me,
jackals and ostriches,
for I put water in the
desert
and rivers in the
wasteland
for my chosen people to
drink,
the people whom I formed
for myself,
that they might announce
my praise.
In
the course of Lent during this Year C, we have made a review of the story of
the salvation of the people of Israel from the patriarchs to the promised land,
reading key texts to remind ourselves of pivotal points in the saga. So we began with Deuteronomy 26:4-10, in
which the Israelite worshiper recited the story of this people from the time of
Jacob to the settlement of the land of Israel.
Then Genesis 15 reminded us of God’s covenant with Abraham which
included the promise of the Exodus and the possession of the land. Exodus 3 called to mind God’s choosing of
Moses and commissioning him to bring the people out of Egypt. Finally, Joshua 5:9-12 gave us a snapshot of
the people of Israel having arrived in the land, as promised, and eating of its
good fruits.
Now
todays reading presents us with the prophet Isaiah, speaking at least 500 years
or more after the settlement of the land.
On behalf of God, he calls to mind the Exodus, when God “opened a way in
the sea” and “snuffed out” the “powerful army” of Pharaoh. But then he says: “Do you remember that? Good!
Well, now forget about it!”
Remember not the events of
the past,
the things of long ago
consider not;
see, I am doing something
new!
God
is going to initiate a “New Exodus,” in which his chosen people will be feed
and watered in the “desert” and the “wasteland.” Even the “wild beasts, jackals, and
ostriches” will honor God at this time.
What
is all this referring to? Key to
understanding the fulfillment is remembering certain texts from the Gospels,
like John the Baptist in John 1:23: “I am the voice of one crying, ‘In the
wilderness make straight the way of the LORD’”—just as our text reads, “In the
desert I make a way.” We should also
remember the account of the transfiguration in Luke 9:31, when Jesus discusses
his upcoming “exodus” with Moses and Elijah.
These and other texts make the connection between Isaiah’s promised “New
Exodus” and the mission of Jesus.
Both
the “wilderness” (see Exekiel 20:35) and the “wild beasts” (see Acts 9, esp.
vv. 9-29) are associated with the Gentile nations in Scripture, and “water” is
an image of God’s Spirit (see Isaiah 44:3).
So Isaiah’s prophecy of water being provided in the wilderness for God’s
people among wild beasts may be understood as a promise that God will pour out
his Spirit among all the nations and form for himself a people from those who
dwell among the Gentiles. The outpouring
of the Holy Spirit is the goal of Jesus’ mission: we see it beginning in John
20:22-23 and continuing through Acts 2 and especially Acts 9, where the Spirit
falls on uncircumcised Gentiles (‘wild beasts’) and God begins to form a people
for himself from these same Gentiles.
P. Our Responsorial Psalm is Psalm 126:
R. (3) The
Lord has done great things for us; we are filled with joy.
When the LORD brought back
the captives of Zion,
we were like men dreaming.
Then our mouth was filled
with laughter,
and our tongue with
rejoicing.
R. The Lord
has done great things for us; we are filled with joy.
Then they said among the
nations,
“The LORD has done great
things for them.”
The LORD has done great
things for us;
we are glad indeed.
R. The Lord
has done great things for us; we are filled with joy.
Restore our fortunes, O
LORD,
like the torrents in the
southern desert.
Those that sow in tears
shall reap rejoicing.
R. The Lord
has done great things for us; we are filled with joy.
Although they go forth
weeping,
carrying the seed to be
sown,
They shall come back
rejoicing,
carrying their sheaves.
R. The Lord
has done great things for us; we are filled with joy.
Psalm
126 is clearly a post-exilic psalm, one sung by the people of Judah after they
had returned from exile to Babylon. It forms part of our Lenten journey through salvation history, reminding us now of the exile to Babylon and the period of return. It
reflects the great hope and joy of this time period, when the Judeans
experienced something about which they had all but given up hope: their
restoration to their land and city (Jerusalem).
The joy of this time is a foretaste of the joy we experience now, having
experienced the fulfillment of Isaiah’s promise in the First Reading. We, at least most of us, are the “wild
beasts” and the “wilderness” that God has transformed through the outpouring of
his Spirit. We have been lead out of
slavery to sin into the freedom of being children of God.
2. Our Second Reading is from Philippians 3:8-14:
Brothers and sisters:
I consider everything as a
loss
because of the supreme
good of knowing
Christ Jesus my Lord.
Christ Jesus my Lord.
For his sake I have
accepted the loss of all things
and I consider them so
much rubbish,
that I may gain Christ and
be found in him,
not having any
righteousness of my own based on the law
but that which comes
through faith in Christ,
the righteousness from
God,
depending on faith to know
him
and the power of his resurrection
and the power of his resurrection
and the sharing of his
sufferings
by being conformed to his death,
by being conformed to his death,
if somehow I may attain
the resurrection from the dead.
It is not that I have
already taken hold of it
or have already attained
perfect maturity,
but I continue my pursuit
in hope that I may possess it,
since I have indeed been
taken possession of by Christ Jesus.
Brothers and sisters, I
for my part
do not consider myself to
have taken possession.
Just one thing: forgetting
what lies behind
but straining forward to
what lies ahead,
I continue my pursuit
toward the goal,
the prize of God’s upward calling,
in Christ Jesus.
As
we journey through Lent and try to intensify our relationship with God through
Jesus Christ, this Second Reading serves as an encouragement for all those who
are sincerely trying—by prayer, fasting, and almsgiving—to grow in holiness. For those who are not trying, of course, this
reading will fall on deaf ears. But for
the sincere, Paul’s words are a comfort:
forgetting what lies
behind
but straining forward to
what lies ahead,
I continue my pursuit
toward the goal … Christ Jesus.
A
greater experience of Jesus Christ at the celebration of Easter is the goal of
our Lenten journey.
Notice
the similarity with the First Reading, which exhorted “Remember not the things
of the past!” and Paul who says, “Forgetting what lies behind!” We can understand the spiritual sense of
these texts as urging us to forget any failures of our Lenten mortifications
and resolutions, and to renew our commitments to prayer and self-sacrifice in
the short time that remains.
St.
Paul also reminds us of the difference between the Old Covenant and the New
Covenant, referred to here as “the Law” and “Faith.” St. Paul says he has no “righteousness of my
own based on the law,” but instead he desires “the righteousness of God.”
The
“righteousness of God” is a supernatural property, and ultimately it cannot be
disconnected from the gift of the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit, which we receive and is renewed in us through the
sacraments received with an attitude of faith, communicates divine attributes
to us. The Spirit gives us a
righteousness that is beyond merely human capabilities. This was the problem with the Old Covenant
and the Law. The Law was well and good
as far as it went—but it did not give us supernatural power, it only instructed
us in what is right to do. The New
Covenant communicates to us God’s presence and power in our lives. But, there is a mystery involved in this: how
much effect this divine power and presence has in our lives does depend on our
cooperation. That is why Paul says, “I
have not already attained perfect maturity, but I continue in my pursuit
….” God does not save us without our
cooperation. We need to receive,
embrace, and respond to the gift of God’s righteousness in the Holy Spirit.
3. The Gospel is John 8:1-11:
Jesus went to the Mount of
Olives.
But early in the morning
he arrived again in the temple area,
he arrived again in the temple area,
and all the people started
coming to him,
and he sat down and taught
them.
Then the scribes and the
Pharisees brought a woman
who had been caught in adultery
and made her stand in the
middle.
They said to him,
“Teacher, this woman was
caught
in the very act of
committing adultery.
Now in the law, Moses
commanded us to stone such women.
So what do you say?”
They said this to test
him,
so that they could have
some charge to bring against him.
Jesus bent down
and began to write on the ground with his finger.
and began to write on the ground with his finger.
But when they continued
asking him,
he straightened up and
said to them,
“Let the one among you who
is without sin
be the first to throw a
stone at her.”
Again he bent down and
wrote on the ground.
And in response, they went
away one by one,
beginning with the elders.
So he was left alone with
the woman before him.
Then Jesus straightened up
and said to her,
“Woman, where are they?
Has no one condemned you?”
She replied, “No one,
sir.”
Then Jesus said, “Neither
do I condemn you.
Go, and from now on do not
sin any more.”
The
scribes and the Pharisees have contrived this whole event as a political trap
for Jesus. We notice immediately that
there is something fishy about the events, because they bring this woman
“caught in the act,” but the man involved is nowhere to be found, even though
the Law of Moses would hold him equally responsible. Where is the man if they caught the woman “in
the act”? Possibly this woman is just a
paid actor, although we just don’t know.
In
any event, this is the nature of the trap: If Jesus responds by telling the
scribes and the Pharisees that they should stone the woman, the scribes and
Pharisees will immediately run to the Roman authorities and report Jesus as
advocating rebellion against the Roman government and its laws, since the Roman
government had reserved to itself alone the authority to apply capital
punishment. No other group or persons in
the empire had the power of execution, and to advocate or attempt the execution
of someone apart from Roman authorization would be interpreted as an act of
sedition.
On
the other hand, if Jesus responds by telling the scribes and Pharisees not to execute the woman, they will
report to the people, “This man Jesus is no true prophet because he defies the
Law of Moses!” Thus, they will succeed
either in getting Jesus arrested or else discrediting him in the eyes of pious
Jews.
Jesus
knows this is a trap, so he refuses to respond.
When they keep pressing him, he offers this suggestion: “Let him who is
without sin throw the first stone.”
By
saying this, Jesus puts the responsibility for the woman’s execution squarely
on the shoulders of the scribes and Pharisees.
They certainly do think that
they themselves are without sin, but they do not dare take up a stone to throw
at the woman, because they would be immediately arrested by the Roman soldiers
who were keeping an eye on the Temple courts from the massive, adjacent
Antonian fortress. The whole proceedings
were probably being watched by soldiers from the parapets of this fortress,
which Rome had built precisely for keeping peace at this most volatile area of
Jerusalem.
So
now Jesus has turned the trap on the Pharisees.
If they throw stones, they will be arrested by the Romans. If they don’t throw stones, they will appear
to be admitting that they have sin. In
the end, they choose the shame of being outwitted in public rather than arrest,
torture, and incarceration by the Roman authorities. The oldest and wisest are the first to figure
out that Jesus has outwitted them; the youngest and foolish keep hanging
around, hoping there is some way out of their “checkmate.” Do not think for a moment that their decision
not to throw stones was actually some kind of sincere conviction in their
hearts that they truly were sinners in need of forgiveness! Certainly not! They just didn’t want to be arrested.
When
they all have left, Jesus asks, “Has no one condemned you?” And she responds, “No one, Lord.” None of her accusers had been willing to
sustain the accusation; therefore, from a legal perspective, there were no longer
any plaintiffs. And how can a judge
condemn a defendant if there are no plaintiffs?
So Jesus says, “Then neither do I condemn you. Go, and from now on do not sin any more.”
If
the woman had really committed adultery, then Jesus exhorts her to do so no
longer. But even if she was a paid
actor, it was a sin to cooperate with the Pharisees in the effort to entrap an
innocent man. And she needs to repent of
that sin.
In
none of this does Jesus relax in the least his teaching on sexual purity. Jesus has the highest standards of sexual
propriety, forbidding not just adultery but even the internal lust that is the
seed of adultery (5:28-30), and that if necessary we should be willing even to
maim ourselves if such will free us from sin.
So in Our Lord we see the paradox of unyielding teaching about the way
of holiness combined with an inexhaustible willingness to forgive, heal, and
restore (Matt 18:22). Jesus' teachings contrast with the perspectives that seem prevalent in the Church nowadays, even in high places in the Church, such that God's mercy is expressed by the approval of sin, especially condoning sexual activity outside of sacramental marriage. The problem is, sexual activity outside of sacramental marriage is not an act of love and harms persons, psychologically, spiritually, and sometimes physically. It is not merciful of God to condone or encourage behavior that damages the human person in multiple dimensions. God comes to us to show us a new way of life, in which we are not enslaved to physical urges but are freed from these attachments actually to be able to love. God's mercy is expressed in forgiving, but not condoning, sin.
In
the context of this Mass, this Gospel reading gives comfort to those many of us
who have botched or messed up our Lenten practices, or even abandoned them and
gone back to a self-indulgent lifestyle in small or large ways. The Lord is ever forgiving. He does not condemn but encourages us to “go
and sin no more.” Yet he does not lie to us by telling us we can attain
eternal life while indulging in sin.
The Lord never tells us an untruth.
Since salvation is by definition an “exodus” or freedom from sin itself (and not merely the punishment for sin), we
cannot be “saved” while we are still “sinning.”
That would be an oxymoron, since sin is what we are saved from. As Pope Francis has often said, God does not
tire of forgiving, but we tire of repenting!
No comments:
Post a Comment