We have
arrived at the Sixth Week of Easter, and continue to bask in the glow of the
story of the growth of the early Church in Acts, the vision of heaven from the
Book of Revelation, and the consolation of Jesus’ words to the Apostles in the
Upper Room from John. It’s a trifecta of
glory in these Readings.
If last
Sunday we noted a “kingdom of love” theme, this week we notice an emphasis on
the idea of the “kingdom of peace.” In
Acts (1st Reading) we see the measures that were necessary to keep
peace in the early Church. In Revelation
(2nd Reading) we see the peace of Eden restored in the heavenly New
Jerusalem. In the Gospel we see Jesus
bestowing his supernatural peace on the disciples.
1. The First
Reading is Acts 15:1-2, 22-29. Because this reading skips Acts 15:3-21,
which I think is very important for understanding the significance of the
passage, I have spliced in the missing text below, to aid our understanding:
Some who had come down from Judea were instructing the brothers,
“Unless
you are circumcised according to the Mosaic practice,
you cannot be
saved.”
Because there arose no little dissension and debate
by Paul and
Barnabas with them,
it was decided that Paul, Barnabas, and some of the
others
should go up to Jerusalem to the apostles and elders
about this
question.
[Acts 15:3 So, being sent on their way by the church, they passed
through both Phoenicia and Samaria, reporting the conversion of the Gentiles,
and they gave great joy to all the brethren.
4 When they came to Jerusalem, they were welcomed by the church and the
apostles and the elders, and they declared all that God had done with
them. 5 But some believers who belonged
to the party of the Pharisees rose up, and said, “It is necessary to circumcise
them, and to charge them to keep the law of Moses.”]
[Acts 15:6 The apostles and the elders were gathered together to
consider this matter. 7 And after there
had been much debate, Peter rose and said to them, “Brethren, you know that in
the early days God made choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles should
hear the word of the gospel and believe.
8 And God who knows the heart bore witness to them, giving them the Holy
Spirit just as he did to us; 9 and he made no distinction between us and them,
but cleansed their hearts by faith. 10
Now therefore why do you make trial of God by putting a yoke upon the neck of
the disciples which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? 11 But we believe that we shall be saved
through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will.”]
[Acts 15:12 And all the assembly kept silence; and they
listened to Barnabas and Paul as they related what signs and wonders God had
done through them among the Gentiles. 13
After they finished speaking, James replied, “Brethren, listen to me. 14 Simeon has related how God first visited
the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name. 15 And with this the words of the prophets
agree, as it is written, 16 ‘After this I will return, and I will rebuild the
dwelling of David, which has fallen; I will rebuild its ruins, and I will set
it up, 17 that the rest of men may seek
the Lord, and all the Gentiles who are called by my name, 18 says the Lord, who has made these things
known from of old.’ 19 Therefore my
judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who turn to God,
20 but should write to them to abstain from the pollutions of idols and from
unchastity and from what is strangled and from blood. 21 For from early generations Moses has had
in every city those who preach him, for he is read every sabbath in the
synagogues.”]
The apostles and elders, in agreement with the whole church,
decided
to choose representatives
and to send them to Antioch with Paul and
Barnabas.
The ones chosen were Judas, who was called Barsabbas,
and Silas,
leaders among the brothers.
This is the letter delivered by them:
“The
apostles and the elders, your brothers,
to the brothers in Antioch, Syria, and
Cilicia
of Gentile origin: greetings.
Since we have heard that some of our number
who
went out without any mandate from us
have upset you with their teachings
and
disturbed your peace of mind,
we have with one accord decided to choose
representatives
and to send them to you along with our beloved Barnabas and
Paul,
who have dedicated their lives to the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
So
we are sending Judas and Silas
who will also convey this same message by word
of mouth:
‘It is the decision of the Holy Spirit and of us
not to place on you
any burden beyond these necessities,
namely, to abstain from meat sacrificed to
idols,
from blood, from meats of strangled animals,
and from unlawful
marriage.
If you keep free of these,
you will be doing what is right.
Farewell.’”
This
Reading is very important for what it demonstrates about the manner in which
the Church should be governed, in order that the peace of the Church may be
maintained. At the beginning of the
reading, we see that the peace of the Church is disturbed by theological
conflict concerning the role of the law of the Mosaic Covenant now that the
community of the New Covenant has been formed.
Some believe, essentially, that one must first become a Jew by entering
the Old Covenant (through circumcision) before one can proceed to enter the New
Covenant. Others say, No, direct entrance
into the New Covenant is possible for Gentiles.
Notice that this is a matter on which the Scriptures—which at that time
consisted only of what we would now call the Old Testament—make no explicit
statement. Therefore a sola scriptura
or “Bible alone” approach is of no help whatsoever in solving this
issue. As is so often the case, the
Church has to make an authoritative decision about a matter not clearly
specified in Sacred Scripture.
How
is this done? A Church council is
called, with Peter present to lead it.
We could say that this the “First Ecumenical Council of Jerusalem.” All the apostles and elders (today, Bishops
and clergy) gather around Peter (today, his successor) and strive to come to a
consensus.
Non-Catholics
and even some Catholics read the account of this Council as if James, not
Peter, is the authoritative figure. This
way of interpretation is understandable, because the way James speaks at the
end could be understood as if he was the dominant figure of the group. However, it is not the only way to interpret
the account. Careful reading reveals
that after Peter gets up to speak (vv. 7-11), there is no further debate, and
the assembly keeps silence. When James
gets up to speak, the first thing he does is to confirm what “Simeon” (Peter’s
Jewish name) has already said. We need
to remember that James was the leader of the conservative, “Judaizing” wing of
the early Church—the Christians who were inclined to require the Gentiles to
follow the law of Moses. His position
has just been thoroughly repudiated by Simon Peter, the leader of the
Apostles. There is tension in the
air. What is going to happen? Will Peter and James fight publically? Will James oppose the prince of the Apostles
and introduce a schism?
No. Instead, James stands down. The reason he speaks last is not because he
is the most authoritative member present.
He speaks last, because he is giving his concession speech. He is conceding the debate to Peter. He just wishes to make the practical suggest
that the Gentiles be requested to at least abstain from the more offensive and
repugnant aspects of Gentile culture out of respect for Jewish sensitivities,
since Gentiles and Jews were now worshiping together in a common body. So in the end, the whole Council ends up
confirming Peter’s position, together with James’ practical suggestions for
implementation.
We
note that the early Church does not split up.
The “circumcisers” do not run off and start the “First Circumcision
Church of Jerusalem” under the leadership of “Pastor James.” The whole Church—even those whose theological
positions were rejected—accepted the conciliar decision and maintained unity.
Thus
the peace of the Church was preserved.
The
Church’s teaching authority, called “the magisterium” and exercised most
solemnly by an ecumenical council under the leadership of (the successor of)
Peter, is a gift to the Church by God to maintain the Church’s peace. Otherwise, the Church would split into
innumerable factions, and conceivably more that 50,000 different churches would
spring up, each with its own peculiar little theological twist or emphasis. God forbid that should happen!
(I’m
being ironic. This has happened, of
course, because many have rejected the authority of the Church expressed in the
successors of Peter and the apostolic college.)
Though
Peter appears as a hero in this narrative, putting an end to debate with his
stirring exhortation, we must give credit to James, who had the grace and
humility to concede the point and abide by the decision of the assembly. Those who “lose” at councils often face the
difficulty of swallowing their pride and accepting a decision with which they
are not comfortable. This requires
holiness, humility, and faith. Pride
seeks for schism in those situations.
We
should also note the argument that James employs to confirm Peter’s decision:
13 …Brethren, listen to me. 14
Simeon has related how God first visited the Gentiles, to take out of them a
people for his name. 15 And with this
the words of the prophets agree, as it is written, 16 ‘After this I will
return, and I will rebuild the dwelling of David, which has fallen; I will
rebuild its ruins, and I will set it up, 17 that the rest of men may seek the
Lord, and all the Gentiles who are called by my name … (Amos 9:11-12)
James
cites a prophecy of Amos concerning the future restoration of the Davidic
Kingdom. Once more, the Davidic Kingdom
will incorporate Gentile nations. Now
that the Gentiles are entering the Church, James understands that the prophecy
of Amos is being fulfilled. But notice
that this interpretation presumes that the Church is the Davidic Kingdom, ruled
by the Son of David, Jesus of Nazareth.
James has a “kingdom ecclesiology.”
But this kingdom must be marked by peace, since its ruler is the Prince
of Peace. The Church’s leadership,
expressed by her officers gathered around Peter, is the means to maintain this
peace.
2. The Responsorial Psalm is Ps 67:2-3, 5, 6, 8
R. (4) O God, let all the nations praise you!
May God have pity on us and bless us;
may he let his face shine upon us.
So may your way be known upon earth;
among all nations, your salvation.
R. O God, let all the nations praise you!
May the nations be glad and exult
because you rule the peoples in equity;
the nations on the earth you guide.
R. O God, let all the nations praise you!
May the peoples praise you, O God;
may all the peoples praise you!
May God bless us,
and may all the ends of the earth fear him!
R. O God, let all the nations praise you!
In
response we sing a psalm of the ancient kingdom of David. This psalm, Psalm 67, calls on all the
“nations”—the goyim or “Gentiles”—to praise the Lord. Many other psalms call on the nations to
praise the God of Israel, as well. This
was not all empty rhetoric. During the
reigns of David and Solomon, it is probable that subjected Gentile vassal
states sent representatives to the imperial capital of Jerusalem and took part
the Temple worship out of respect for their royal overlord. So some of the psalms were probably composed
at a time when it could be expected that Gentiles of various kinds could be
found in the sanctuary courts at any given time. The worship of the ancient kingdom of David
anticipated the “universal” or international character of the Catholic Church.
3. The Second Reading is Rev 21:10-14, 22-23:
The angel took me in spirit to a great, high
mountain
and showed me the holy city Jerusalem
coming down out of heaven from
God.
It gleamed with the splendor of God.
Its radiance was like that of a
precious stone,
like jasper, clear as crystal.
It had a massive, high
wall,
with twelve gates where twelve angels were stationed
and on which names
were inscribed,
the names of the twelve tribes of the Israelites.
There were
three gates facing east,
three north, three south, and three west.
The wall of
the city had twelve courses of stones as its foundation,
on which were
inscribed the twelve names
of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
I saw no temple
in the city
for its temple is the Lord God almighty and the Lamb.
The city had
no need of sun or moon to shine on it,
for the glory of God gave it light,
and
its lamp was the Lamb.
This is a vision of the Church, primarily the
Church Triumphant (whose boundaries are essentially coterminous with heaven)
but also with application to the Church Militant (i.e. the Church on
earth). The precious stones that adorn
the Heavenly Jerusalem recall the precious stones of Eden (Gen 2:11-12), since
the Heavenly Jerusalem is a New Eden in which the peace of Eden is
restored. At the end of Genesis 3,
angels are placed at the eastern entrance to Eden (since Eden, being a
sanctuary/Temple, had only one, east-facing entrance; Gen 3:24). The New Jerusalem is more accessible (twelve
gates), but at each is stationed an angel to keep out what is impure. This represents the spiritual nature of the
Church, and the spiritual warfare that goes on to protect the Church. The angels still defend the Church
spiritually, and invocation of St. Michael, for example, has begun to return in
many dioceses around the country.
The gates for the Twelve Tribes represents the
Israelite heritage of the Church (that we are joined to the saints of the Old
Testament) as well as the fact that we constitute the “New Israel,” ruled by
the Apostles (see Luke 22:30), that is, their successors.
The apostolic foundations of the city point to
the fact that we are founded upon the teaching of the Apostles, expressed
solemnly in the Sacred Scriptures of the New Testament, but also transmitted in
the Church’s living tradition. But it is
not just their teaching, but also their ongoing ministry, carried on by their
successors, which serves as our foundation.
Without the authoritative teaching ministry of the Apostles, expressed
in the “ecumenical council” in the First Reading, the city would crumple into
chaos as each person interpreted the Scriptures in their own way, and all peace
would be lost.
4. The Gospel is Jn 14:23-29:
Jesus said to his disciples:
“Whoever loves me will keep my word,
and
my Father will love him,
and we will come to him and make our dwelling with
him.
Whoever does not love me does not keep my words;
yet the word you hear is
not mine
but that of the Father who sent me.
“I have told you this while I am
with you.
The Advocate, the Holy Spirit,
whom the Father will send in my
name,
will teach you everything
and remind you of all that I told you.
Peace I
leave with you; my peace I give to you.
Not as the world gives do I give it to
you.
Do not let your hearts be troubled or afraid.
You heard me tell you,
‘I am
going away and I will come back to you.’
If you loved me,
you would rejoice
that I am going to the Father;
for the Father is greater than I.
And now I have
told you this before it happens,
so that when it happens you may believe.”
During
these last days before the Feast of the Ascension (Thursday May 9, or
transferred to Sunday May 12), we liturgical “re-live” the end of the forty-day
period the Apostles spent with Jesus, as he prepared them for his
departure. We have no direct record of
Jesus’ teachings during this time, either in Acts or the Gospels. So the Church turns to Jesus discourse in
John during the Last Supper, which suits very well, because in it Jesus speaks
extensively about his imminent departure and the coming of the Holy Spirit.
We
comment on each section:
Jesus said to his disciples:
“Whoever loves me will keep my word,
and
my Father will love him,
and we will come to him and make our dwelling with
him.
Whoever does not love me does not keep my words;
yet the word you hear is
not mine
but that of the Father who sent me.
Here
we see the convergence of love and obedience.
Liberal Christianity is fond of forcing a wedge between these, by
asserting “we used to follow the commands of a God of justice” but now we “are
in a relationship with a God of love.”
There is no disjunction between these relaties. Commandments and obedience merge into
love. God’s commands are given for our
good, to show us the path to love. Our
obedience shows that we both love and trust him. A lawless (antinomian) Christianity is not
loving, no matter how exuberant the worship or how much emotion is expressed in
the prayer.
The
Father and Son promise to “make our dwelling” with the one who “keeps my
word.” This is a Temple theme, picking
up the motifs of the Second Reading. The
one who keeps the word of Jesus becomes the “New Jerusalem,” the dwelling place
of the “Lord God Almighty and the Lamb.”
“I have told you this while I am with you.
The Advocate, the Holy
Spirit,
whom the Father will send in my name,
will teach you everything
and
remind you of all that I told you.
This
passage is not a promise of infused, infallible knowledge for each individual
believer. We must remember that these
words were spoken to the Apostles as a group (the “Apostolic College”), and the
Greek is second-person plural (“y’all”, not “you”). This is a promise of the Spirit to the whole
Church, as represented by her officers, the Apostles—and by extension, their
successors. This promise of being
“taught” and “reminded” of the truth told them by Jesus is best expressed when
they gather as a college to seek to understand and explain the faith
better—which is what we saw happening in the First Reading. The Ecumenical Councils throughout history
best manifest the truth of this promise of Jesus that the Holy Spirit would
“teach and remind” his Church throughout time.
Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you.
Not as the world gives
do I give it to you.
On
the one hand, this verse is a word of consolation to the whole Church and to
each individual believer, that God will provide a supernatural peace that
cannot be explained or justified on rational or observational grounds. Though all seem turned against us, and
persecutions and tribulations abound, still we can experience a lasting peace
unlike anything natural or of this temporal world.
On
the other hand, this promise of peace follows directly from the promise of
“teaching and reminding” the Apostolic College in the previous verses. The authoritative teaching of the Apostles
and their successors assembled around Peter (that is, an ecumenical council)
brings peace to the Church by settling questions of dispute and establishing
doctrine clearly.
Do not let your hearts be troubled or afraid.
You heard me tell
you,
‘I am going away and I will come back to you.’
If you loved me,
you would
rejoice that I am going to the Father;
for the Father is greater than I.
And
now I have told you this before it happens,
so that when it happens you may
believe.”
In
these last words, Jesus cares for the Apostles and provides pastoral comfort,
“pastoring the pastors” so that they remain courageous and confident in their
duties even in the apparent absence of Jesus Himself. But his words of comfort touch all
Christians: we ought not be troubled or
afraid, because we have confidence of the return of the Lord. The tribulations we are experiencing are
nothing new and unexpected: He warned us ahead of time that they would take place
(“I told you this before it happens”) so that we can maintain our faith during
the time of testing (“so that when it happens you may believe”).
To
summarize, in these Readings Holy Mother Church speaks to us about how to have
peace. The path to peace includes:
(1)
Faithfulness to the teaching of the Apostolic College, rather than trusting in
private judgment or rogue pastors.
(2)
Obedience to the “word” of Jesus, so that the Father and Son may dwell in our
hearts and give us their peace.
(3)
Trust in Jesus promise that he will return and bring us to live with the
Father.
No comments:
Post a Comment